For heads of content
Know before you publish whether a model will read it properly.
Retrieval does not read your page. It pulls one passage out and shows it alone. A paragraph that made sense in context can be meaningless the moment that happens.
Check a draftThree runs free. Nothing to install.
You publish something that quietly contradicts the pricing page, and you find out six months later from a model repeating it back to a prospect.
What the job actually feels like
Line level, not a score
“This passage opens with these factors, and what it refers to is two sections up.” A score of 68 tells you nothing you can edit.
Three free checks, no account
Paste a draft or give us a URL. The ceiling arrives after the value, which is the only place a ceiling belongs.
We bring you the work
Once an audit runs, passages on your own site that are losing specific questions arrive in a queue, each with the evidence. You do not have to go looking.
What the evidence says
- Quotations, statistics and citations were the strongest interventions tested. Tone did essentially nothing.GEO paper, KDD 2024 [VERIFIED]
- Keyword stuffing performed below baseline, so repetition actively hurt.GEO paper, KDD 2024 [VERIFIED]
- Adding JSON-LD barely moved citations across 1,885 pages against 4,000 matched controls.Ahrefs, May 2026 [VERIFIED]
What this will not do
We predict whether a passage is likely to survive retrieval. We cannot promise it will be cited, and any tool that does is measuring something else.
Check a draft